logo
About UsNewsConveningsResearchPolicy ActionResourcesNetworking
   

Research > K-12 Education > Dropouts

May 17, 2005

Confronting the Graduation Rate Crisis
in the South


Executive Summary NCLB Reports

Every year, across the country, a dangerously high percentage of students—disproportionately poor and minority—disappear from the educational pipeline before graduating from high school. According to a study released by The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University (CRP) and the Urban Institute in 2004, only about 68% of all students nationally who enter 9th grade will graduate “on time” with regular diplomas in 12th grade. While the graduation rate for White students is 75%, only approximately half of Black, Latino, and Native American students earn regular diplomas alongside their classmates. Graduation rates are even lower for minority males. Yet, because of misleading and inaccurate reporting of dropout and graduation rates, and an exclusive preoccupation with testing data, the public remains largely unaware of this educational and civil rights crisis.

This crisis is particularly acute in Southern states, which have some of the lowest overall graduation rates in the country. The South is a critical region to examine because it has a very large and rapidly growing population and has always been home to a majority of African Americans. In addition, several southern states are now in the epicenter of a huge Latino migration. The region also has a history of racial inequality including unlawful school segregation. As pointed out in this report, two independent studies show a high correlation between racially and socio-economically segregated schools and very low graduation rates. Not surprisingly, the research shows that poor, racially isolated Whites have low graduation rates that are nearly identical to poor, racially isolated Blacks. Nationally, few predominantly White schools have concentrated poverty, but there are significant numbers of these in parts of the rural South.

According to new estimates compiled by Christopher Swanson of the Urban Institute, the Southern region (defined here as sixteen states and the District of Columbia that practiced legally imposed segregation prior to Brown v. Board of Education: West Virginia, D.C., Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Mississippi, Georgia, Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Florida, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Virginia) graduated only 64.5% of its students in 2002, or several points lower than the national average. Minority students fared far worse. Only 55.3% of Blacks and 56.3% of Latinos graduated on time with their peers, as compared with 70.5% of whites, and 82.2% of Asians.

In this report, we give special attention to five southern states -- Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and North Carolina. These states report graduation rates in 2002 ranging from a high of 85% in North Carolina to a low of 61.8% in Georgia. When a more accurate measurement, the Cumulative Promotion Index (CPI) was used, the graduation rates for these five states dipped far lower than these official estimates. In keeping with the national trend, graduation rates for Black and Latino students in these five states are substantially lower still. In Georgia, which has a substantial and growing Latino population, the rates for Blacks, Latinos and Native Americans were all below 50%.

Black, Native American and Latino males fared worst of all. Across the Southern region, the graduation rate for Black males averages only 47.4%, and 50.9% for Latinos. In only one of the five special focus states—Louisiana—did more than half (51.1%) of Black males graduate on time. In Florida, Black males had the lowest graduation rate out of the five states, a mere 38.3%. Of the two states where data on Native Americans males is available, North Carolina had a graduation rate of just 31.7%.

The severity of this situation is further underscored by the dearth of schools in many of these states which “beat the odds” by graduating a higher than expected percentage of their students. Researchers at Johns Hopkins University searched for schools in each of the five states that met the following criteria:

  • at least 40% of students qualify for free lunch;

  • where 25% or more of students are Black or Latino;

  • and where promoting power, defined as a school’s success in moving students from grade to grade, averaged over three years (2000--2002), was at least 80%.

In Georgia, they could not identify a single school that met the criteria. In Florida, they found only two such schools, four in North Carolina, 12 in Louisiana, and 15 in Mississippi. The problems that these schools face are likely to become more severe, because Blacks in all Southern states have faced increasing segregation since 1990 and 9/10 of highly segregated Black or Latino schools experience concentrated poverty.

Unfortunately, neither the states, nor the U.S. Department of Education is doing much to hold schools and districts accountable for such high rates of school failure. Although Congress inserted graduation rate accountability provisions into the No Child Left Behind law, the lax enforcement on this accountability indicator at both the state and federal level has rendered this requirement virtually useless. While states must meet stringent requirements to improve test scores or risk serious sanctions under this federal law, they face few consequences for failing to improve graduation rates. For example, in North Carolina all students (including all subgroups) must improve test scores, step by step, until they reach 100% proficiency in reading and math by 2014. If any subgroup misses one step, the school fails to make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and faces eventual sanctions such as district takeover. In contrast, while the state has set a goal of graduating 90% of its students, only the most minimal improvement is required, and subgroups are never required to show improvement to meet AYP. Specifically, districts that fail to meet the 90% goal will still make AYP if they achieve as little as 1/10 of 1% progress over the prior year. At that rate, Charlotte, starting at a graduation rate of 57.1 %, has 329 years to meet the 90% graduation rate goal, yet only nine more years to meet the testing goals!

Dropping out is related to failure in the job market and to criminal activity. The low graduation rates and lax accountability are particularly distressing when viewed alongside the high incarceration rates in this region, particularly among Blacks and Latinos. In every one of these states, incarceration spending increased between 1980 and 2000, from 60% in North Carolina to 201% in Mississippi. Failure to graduate from high school triples the likelihood of being imprisoned. According to researcher Russell Rumberger, the 114,382 students who were officially reported as dropouts from each of the five states highlighted in the 2002-03 year will cost the state $29.7 billion in lost wages. Rumberger also calculated the increased incarceration cost for the state of Georgia at $105 million.

As alarming as they are, these figures only begin to convey the magnitude of the human, economic and social cost to the region of tolerating these low graduation rates. When high numbers of youth leave school ill-prepared to contribute to our labor force and to civic life, our economy and our democracy suffer. Life opportunities for these youth and for their children are dramatically curtailed. Dropouts are much less likely to marry and to form stable families, and their children are very likely to drop out as well. A renewed commitment to keeping more students in school until they graduate from high school is not just sound educational policy; it is sound economic, public safety and criminal justice policy. Increasing on-time graduation rates offers a win/win strategy that will not only improve the region’s economic vitality, but will predictably reduce crime, lower incarceration costs, and salvage lives in the process. While there are many causes for dropping out, and substantial research on policy and programs that can increase graduation rates, there have been very few significant state or federal initiatives to seriously implement these programs.


NOTE: The following files are available for download in PDF Format () and might take a while to download. Please allow a couple of minutes for them to appear on your screen.

To view the FULL REPORT click below:

Confronting the Graduation Rate Crisis in the South