logo
About UsNewsConveningsResearchPolicy ActionResourcesNetworking
   
 

Resources > Action Kits > School Discipline


Action Kit: Zero Tolerance and School Discipline

Civil Rights in BriefQuestions and AnswersLegal StepsAdvice for AdvocatesAdvice for Advocates
Sample OCR ComplaintsSample FOIA RequestsPress and MediaContacts and Resources
 

CIVIL RIGHTS IN BRIEF: ZERO TOLERANCE AND SCHOOL DISCIPLINE

BACKGROUND

Numerous stories about “zero tolerance” school discipline policies have surfaced across the country. They are stories about students of all races and as young as four, who have had their educational opportunities taken away for offenses ranging from bringing a nail clipper to school to throwing peanuts on a school bus.

Some school officials argue that having “zero tolerance” for not only violent behavior, but also disruptive behavior is necessary for school safety. Parents argue that children who engage in typical adolescent behavior are not a threat to safety and excluding these children from the classroom is not an appropriate solution.

Under zero tolerance, school officials often:

  1. require automatic suspension or expulsion for particular conduct (such as guns, drugs, alcohol or fights); or
  2. use punishments that do not fit, or correct, the behavior in question. The punishment may be too harsh and ultimately not help the student. For example, using a zero tolerance approach, a student may be suspended for cursing because the school does not tolerate the use of profanity. Or a school may expel a student who engaged in a fight, although no one was hurt. Schools may also suspend or expel students for other conduct that creates no threat to safety (such as disobedience, insubordination, or disruptive behavior).

Zero tolerance policies may be in school district or school student codes of conduct, but they are also found in the way that school officials practice discipline. Thus, a code of conduct may give school officials choices of punishments, but where school officials choose the harshest punishments, they are applying zero tolerance.
School disciplinary decisions should take into account circumstances and should ultimately seek to modify behavior, but above all, should not punish a child by denying them an education.

NATIONAL TRENDS

Schools are safe places: zero tolerance policies are an unnecessary means to correct student misconduct. Since 1993, public schools nationwide have experienced a decrease in both violent and non-violent crimes. Despite this, suspensions and expulsions of students nationwide have increased.

In 1997-98, more than 3.2 million students were suspended and 87,000 were expelled.

School safety is critical, but a majority of the students suspended are not a threat to safety.

Suspending & Expelling Students Has Devastating Consequences: Students suspended or expelled from schools are:

  • most often, sitting at home, or are on the streets, with no educational alternatives;
  • likely to be labeled a “trouble maker;”
  • likely to fail academically;
  • likely to drop out;
  • likely to be sent to the juvenile justice system.

Suspensions and expulsions, regardless of length of time, stay on a child’s academic record and may negatively affect chances of admission to college.

Many school districts use law enforcement agencies to assist in discipline issues. In fact, many States require that students be arrested for certain offenses, including assaults, which school officials may interpret to include minor schoolyard scuffles. Also, depending on State law, a student breaking school rules may be charged with juvenile delinquency or as a “child in need of supervision,” which could lead to detention in a juvenile facility or termination of parental rights.

CIVIL RIGHTS TRENDS

Students of color are disproportionately suspended:

  • African-American children only represent 17% of public school enrollment, but 33% of out-of-school suspensions. White students, 63% of public school enrollment, represent only 50% of suspensions.
  • In Minnesota, for example, 25% of African-American students were suspended.
  • Latino students are also singled out for discipline; in Tennessee, more than 38% of Latino students have been suspended.
  • Research shows that these disparities are not due to poverty or inherently bad behavior. Students of color are more likely to be suspended for non-violent, minor misconduct such as disobedience, disruption, and disrespect of authority.

WHAT DOES THE LAW SAY?

What are the rights of children who are unfairly suspended or expelled from school?

1) Right to a School Hearing:

School administrators must provide students:

  • notice of the charges against them;
  • the basis of the accusation; and
  • an opportunity to tell his/her side of
    the story.

Depending on the type of punishment or length of suspension, this can occur in an informal meeting with the school’s disciplinarian or principal or as part of a more formal hearing process. Parents may appeal decisions to the School Board. (éIn most School Districts, there is a limited time period for requesting an appeal.) In many cases, a child has served out a suspension before an appeal has been granted. If you believe the decision is unfair, you should appeal the decision any way. Otherwise, the punishment will continue to be a mark on the student’s record.

Parents are advised to check local school board policies for more information.

2) The U.S. Constitution and Federal Law Protect Children from Discrimination:

Racial discrimination in education is prohibited under both the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (State laws may also apply.)

The Equal Protection Clause can be used to challenge school disciplinary actions or policies where treatment can be traced to racial hostility of school officials.

Title VI prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in school programs and activities receiving federal funds. It may be used where racial differences in school discipline are due to intentional discrimination or to a school discipline policy that has a different and harmful impact on minority students when compared to whites.

3) Federal Law Protects Students With Disabilities Who are Suspended or Otherwise Removed from School:

Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997 (IDEA), students with disabilities have a right to a “free and appropriate public education,” that will meet the child’s special needs. Also, students with disabilities who are disciplined have the following protections:

Students with Disabilities may be Removed from School for Up to 10 Consecutive School Days

Students with disabilities may NOT be suspended for more than 10 consecutive school days for one incident of misconduct, unless students without disabilities would receive the same punishment. During this 10-day period, school systems are permitted to deny education services to students with disabilities only if services are not provided to students without disabilities under similar circumstances.

Longer Removals from School Trigger More Protections

Schools may also order additional removals of not more than 10 consecutive school days in the same school year for separate acts of misconduct, so long as the removals are not considered a “change in placement.” A disciplinary removal is a “change in placement” if the removal:

  • is for more than 10 consecutive school days; OR
  • there is a pattern of removals that add up to more than 10 days or there is a pattern in the length of each removal, the total amount of time the child is removed, and the closeness of the removals to one another.

A student with disabilities who has been removed from school for more than 10 days in the same school year MUST receive educational services that will enable her/him to progress in the general curriculum and achieve the goals in the student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP).

Students Removed from School for More than Ten School Days are Entitled to a “Functional Behavioral Assessment” and a “Behavioral Intervention Plan”

A student with disabilities who is removed for more than 10 school days in a school year, or is beginning a “change in placement,” has a right to an IEP Team meeting to develop a “functional behavioral assessment” if one has not already occurred. This assessment ensures that behavior problems are identified, addressed and needed supports are provided. This IEP Team meeting must be done no later than 10 business days after the removal from school.

The IEP Team must follow-up by developing and implementing (or changing) a behavioral intervention program for the child. Parents have the right to participate in all IEP Team meetings. Parents who do not speak English MUST be given translation assistance.

A Student has a Right to a “Manifestation Determination Review” if There is a “Change in Placement” Due to Discipline

Parents must be immediately notified, if a school decides to remove a child from school for a period that constitutes a “change in placement.” The IEP Team MUST conduct a “manifestation determination review” to determine whether the behavior that led to the disciplinary action is related to the child’s disability. This review must occur within 10 school days of the removal.

If the IEP Team finds that the student’s behavior is related to the disability, the student must be readmitted to school right away, and his/her IEP should be changed to include services that address the behavioral problem.

If the child’s behavior is not caused by the disability, then the school may follow its discipline policies. However, special education services must be provided.

In Some Cases, Students with Disabilities may be Placed in Alternative Schools or Classes for Up to 45 days, but in Some States, Special Educational Services Must Still be Provided

Schools may order a change in a child’s placement to an “appropriate interim alternative educational setting” for the same amount of time that a student without disabilities would be subject to discipline, but not more than 45 days if:

  • the child carries a weapon to school or to a school function; OR
  • the child knowingly has, uses, sells or solicits illegal drugs on school grounds or at a school function.

Parents must be notified immediately about this decision and an IEP Team must determine an appropriate interim alternative educational setting. In addition, a school may seek an order from a hearing officer to place a student in an “appropriate interim alternative educational setting” for up to 45 days if the hearing officer undertakes the following four actions:

  • determines that the school system has shown, by substantial evidence, that keeping the student in the current placement is substantially likely to result in injury to the child or others;
  • considers the appropriateness of the student’s placement;
  • considers whether the school system has made reasonable efforts to minimize the risk or harm in the student’s current placement, including the use of supplementary aids and services;
  • determines that the interim alternative educational setting allows the student to participate in the general curriculum, continue to receive the services that will enable the student to meet the IEP goals, and addresses the child’s behavior so that it does not happen again.

Children Have a Right to “STAY PUT” if Their Parents Dispute School Decisions

Students with disabilities have a right to “stay put” in their current placement until disputes and appeals about disciplinary and other school actions are resolved. This rule does not apply to cases involving weapons, drugs or injury to self or others.

RESPONDING TO ZERO TOLERANCE POLICIES

Alternatives to Harsh Punishments

Safe and responsible schools have the following characteristics:

  • A shift away from disciplinary practices designed to rid schools of “the problem” toward a more inclusive school.
  • Specific strategies are devised for providing students and teachers with opportunities to develop strong bonds.
  • Teacher and staff training is focused on positive classroom management techniques, conflict resolution and helping them to understand the causes of disruptive behavior and cultural differences.
  • A school-wide code of conduct and expectations for student behaviors is widely promoted and understood.
  • Student sanctions are considered on a case-by-case basis with input from students and parents.
  • Programs that assist in changing disruptive behaviors, keep students on track academically, and in school, are used as alternatives to suspension.

If Your Child has been Unfairly Disciplined You May:

  • Appeal a school decision by requesting a due process hearing (the school must make arrangements for this hearing), and if necessary, go to court.
  • File a complaint of discrimination with the Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Education. You must file with OCR within 180 calendar days of the discriminatory act. A complaint may be based upon different treatment and/or impact (where one race is impacted by discipline more than another).

Contact the OCR at:

Office for Civil Rights
US Department of Education
600 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, DC 20202-1100
(202)205-5413 (phone)
(800)421-3481 (toll free)
(202)205-5166 (TTY)
www.ed.gov/offices/OCR/howto.html

WHAT CAN YOUR COMMUNITY DO TO KEEP STUDENTS IN SCHOOL?

  • Organize parents and students for change.
  • Assist in developing Student Codes of Conduct for the School District, individual schools and for classrooms. Students and parents should be involved in setting these policies and standards for behavior.
  • Hold parent and student trainings on the Student Codes of Conduct to ensure that everyone understands their rights and responsibilities.
  • Request that the School District establish programs that are alternatives to out-of-school suspension, which keep students in school and provide them with counseling and academics.
  • Request that the schools provide conflict resolution and peer mediation training to students.
  • Collect data on suspensions and expulsions from your State Department of Education and School District. (Very few keep race and gender data.) Publicize the data in your community and in the media. (Applied Research Center in Oakland, CA has a CD-Rom for data collection; www.arc.org)
  • If your State does not keep data, request that your State Department require data collection by race, gender, age, and type of punishment and conduct.
  • Request that the School District establish Disciplinary Committees at each school that include parents, students, and other community members of color. These Committees review disciplinary decisions and may hold hearings and overrule a decision.
  • Request that the School District permit advocates to represent students in disciplinary hearings. Advocates are trained community members who understand the code of conduct and hearing procedures.
  • Work with your School District to develop a policy limiting circumstances under which police may be called to school to deal with disciplinary issues. (San Francisco, CA has such a policy.) Include that the school must call a parent immediately if a child is to be arrested.
  • Establish a community-school for suspended children to attend during their days out-of-school, where students keep up with school work and receive counseling and conflict resolution training.